We believe that just peace movement offers a critical shift in focus and imagination. Recognizing that all life is sacred and seeking peace through violence is unsustainable. Peace does not mean the total absence of any conflict. It means the absence of violence in all forms and the unfolding of conflict in a constructive way.
Peace therefore exists where people are interacting non-violently and are managing their conflict positively – with respectful attention to the legitimate needs and interest of all concerned.

Wise Bridge in the just peace approach turns our attention to rehumanization, participatory processes, nonviolent resistance, restorative justice, reconciliation, racial justice, and creative strategies of active positive way for human communication improvement to build sustainable peace, transform conflict to friendship and end cycles of violence.

In domestic law and in the case of any disagreement, individuals understandably aim to achieve the best possible outcome for their position (or perhaps an organization they represent). However, the principles of fairness, seeking mutual benefit and maintaining a relationship are the keys to a successful outcome.
Methods and procedures for the peaceful (pacific) settlement of disputes have been made available in the domestic law like International Law method as following:
Out of court: external dispute resolution
In court or Adjudicative: national court
typically denotes a wide range of dispute resolution processes and techniques that act as a means for disagreeing parties to come to an agreement short of litigation However, ADR is also increasingly being adopted as a tool to help settle disputes alongside the court system itself.

The main advantage of this form of dispute settlement is that it allows the parties themselves to control the process and the solution.
ADR advantages:

1. delivering respect, for example, affirming the feelings of a visitor, while staying explicitly neutral on the facts of a case

2. active listening, serving as a sounding board,

3. providing and explaining information, one-on-one, for example, about policies and rules, and about the context of a concern,

4. receiving vital information ,one-on-one, for example, from those reporting unacceptable or illegal behavior,

5. reframing issues,

6. helping to develop and evaluate new options for the issues at hand,

7. helping people help themselves to use a direct approach, for example, helping people collect and analyze their own information, helping people to draft a letter about their issues, coaching and role-playing,

8. offering shuttle diplomacy, for example, helping employees and managers to think through proposals that may resolve a dispute, facilitating discussions,

9. "looking into" a problem informally,

10. Suitable for multi-party disputes

11. Lower costs, in many cases it's free when involving consumers

12. Likelihood and speed of settlements, Flexibility of process and Practical solutions

13. Wider range of issues can be considered

14. Shared future interests may be protected and Confidentiality

as our legal partners include the world’s law firms and many of the leading independent firms across a wide range of jurisdictions, So wisebridge just manage by its directors and there is no employment relations with its partners and attorneys at law.

as our mission is providing tailor made strategies around our clients’ needs, and developing Innovative solutions to suit our clients’ goals." and in our approach, Just peace, we try to settle disputes either by the parties themselves or with the help of other entities including negotiation, commissions of inquiry, mediation, conciliation and good Offices. The rising popularity of ADR can be explained by the increasing caseload of traditional courts, the perception that ADR imposes fewer costs for transferring case to courts, long procedures, paperwork, traffic in the courts, so it might has direct effect on environment.

we try to prevent small problems from becoming large ones.

we try to build a dialogue between two or more people or parties intended to reach a beneficial outcome. This beneficial outcome can be for all of the parties involved, or just for one or some of them. It is aimed to resolve points of difference, to gain advantage for an individual or collective, or to craft outcomes to satisfy various interests. so they don't need to refer their case to court and face with judicial procedure.

Arbitration is considered the most effective and equitable wise bridge means of dispute settlement.. In arbitration, disputes are resolved, with binding effect, by a person or persons acting in a judicial manner in private, rather than by a national court of law that would have jurisdiction but for the agreement of the parties to exclude it.
A conflict of interests may also give rise to a presumption when an arbitrator stands to secure a personal gain from the outcome of the case but deliberately fails to disclose this circumstance. For example, the presumption would attach to an arbitrator who knowingly failed to disclose significant business dealings with a party which are likely to be affected by the outcome of the arbitration.

we try to diagnose and identify weaknesses within our arbitration system which may present opportunities for corruption to occur.

as an arbitrator who, induced by personal gain or the prospect thereof, disregards the duty of neutrality to improperly decide or influence the outcome of an arbitration submitted to his or her consideration. we try to diagnose and identify weaknesses within our arbitration system which may present opportunities for corruption to occur.